Biportal endoscopic cervical open-door laminoplasty to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

BACKGROUND: Although cervical laminoplasty is a frequently utilized surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, it is primarily performed using conventional open surgical techniques. We attempted the minimally invasive cervical laminoplasty using biportal endoscopic approach. METHODS: Contralateral lamina access is facilitated by creating space through spinous process drilling, followed by lamina hinge formation. Subsequently, the incised lamina is elevated from ipsilateral aspect, and secure metal plate fixation is performed. CONCLUSION: We successfully performed the cervical open door laminoplasty using biportal endoscopic approach. Biportal endoscopic cervical open-door laminoplasty may be a minimally invasive technique that can prevent complications related with open surgery.

Prospective Investigation of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament and Disc Complex after Posterior Stabilization and Decompression Surgery in Patients With Non-OPLL (Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament) Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

BACKGROUND: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a prevalent cause of spinal cord dysfunction in adults, primarily from degenerative changes. The efficacy of treatment strategies, especially surgical approaches, remains debated. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the long-term impact of posterior fusion laminectomy on the posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) thickness, disc complex, and myelomalacia signal changes in CSM patients. METHODS: A single-centre, prospective study from January 2020 to December 2021 included CSM patients without ossified posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from baseline, 6, and 12 months postoperatively were collected. Measurements on the MRI were performed using the Osirix MD software, focusing on the PLL width, myelopathic foci dimensions, and canal diameter. RESULTS: Out of the 82 initially enrolled patients, 64 were considered for analysis. Postoperatively, a significant reduction in PLL width and myelopathic foci dimensions was observed, alongside a considerable increase in the canal diameter. Clinical outcomes based on the Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scale also showcased marked improvements post-surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior fusion laminectomy effectively reduces anterior pressure in CSM patients. This treatment may represent an optimal surgical approach for selected CSM cases. Furthermore, more extensive studies with extended follow-up are advocated.

Failure of Surgical Equipoise in Posterior Cord Syndrome Myelopathy.

We suggest that a clinical diagnosis of posterior cord syndrome indicates primary posterior decompression in cervical spondylotic myelopathy cases. We present two unique cases of failed anterior decompression in neutrally aligned necks with compressive myelopathy and a literature review. Two recent cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy that failed to respond after anterior surgical decompression and fusion surgery were observed at our institution. Both patients had motor strength preservation but were unable to stand and walk independently and had other clinical findings consistent with posterior cord syndrome rather than the more common anterior or central cord syndromes, and both responded well to staged posterior decompression. Posterior cervical decompression successfully relieved posterior cord syndrome symptoms after a failed anterior decompression in both of our cases. Posterior cord syndrome is a rare syndrome best diagnosed clinically and should be considered in cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in which motor strength testing is preserved.

Investigation of the Efficacy of Bilateral Osteoligamentous Decompression via Hemilaminectomy in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Clinical Study.

OBJECTIVE: Cervical stability may deteriorate and kyphotic spinal deformities may develop in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) after laminectomy or laminoplasty. This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of the "bilateral osteoligamentous decompression via unilateral hemilaminectomy approach (UHBOLD)" technique in CSM patients. METHODS: The study included 34 adult patients who underwent UHBOLD surgery for CSM between 2016 and 2022. A record was made for all patients of age, gender, number of operated levels, preoperative and postoperative long-term follow-up VAS scores, Nurick grade values and mJOA scores, kyphosis angles measured on X-ray, and spinal canal areas measured on T2-weighted MR axial images. RESULTS: Preoperative VAS scores of the patients were 6 (4-9), Nurick grade values were 3 (2-5), mJOA scores were 10.50 ± 3.42, kyphosis angles were -13.34 ± 13.69° and spinal canal areas were 87.11 ± 28.30 mm2. In postoperative long-term follow-up of these patients, VAS scores were 2 (1-5), Nurick grade values were 1 (0-5), mJOA scores were 13.94 ± 3.09, kyphosis angles were -15.07 ± 12.78° and spinal canal areas were 149.65 ± 42.57 mm2. A statistically significant difference was determined between the preoperative and the postoperative long-term follow-up VAS scores, Nurick grade values, mJOA scores, and spinal canal areas (P < 0.001). Kyphosis angles were not different (P = 0.198), and no instability was observed in any patient in long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The UHBOLD technique performed in multilevel CSM patients did not cause any change in cervical lordosis angle in long-term follow-up, did not cause cervical kyphotic deformity or cervical instability, and significantly improved Nurick grade values, and VAS and mJOA scores.

Trends in cervical laminoplasty and 30-day postoperative complications: 10-year results from a retrospective, multi-institutional study of 1095 patients.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the recent 10-year trends in cervical laminoplasty and 30-day postoperative complications. METHODS: This retrospective multi-institutional cohort study enrolled patients who underwent laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. The primary outcome was the occurrence of all-cause 30-day complications. Trends were investigated and compared in the early (2008-2012) and late (2013-2017) periods. RESULTS: Among 1095 patients (mean age, 66 years; 762 [70%] male), 542 and 553 patients were treated in the early and late periods, respectively. In the late period, patients were older at surgery (65 years vs. 68 years), there were more males (66% vs. 73%), and open-door laminoplasty (50% vs. 69%) was the preferred procedure, while %CSM (77% vs. 78%) and the perioperative JOA scores were similar to the early period. During the study period, the rate of preservation of the posterior muscle-ligament complex attached to the C2/C7-spinous process (C2, 89% vs. 93%; C7, 62% vs. 85%) increased and the number of laminoplasty levels (3.7 vs. 3.1) decreased. While the 30-day complication rate remained stable (3.9% vs. 3.4%), C5 palsy tended to decrease (2.4% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.059); superficial SSI increased significantly (0% vs. 1.3%, P = 0.015), while the decreased incidence of deep SSI did not reach statistical significance (0.6% vs. 0.2%). CONCLUSIONS: From 2008 to 2017, there were trends toward increasing age at surgery and surgeons' preference for refined open-door laminoplasty. The 30-day complication rate remained stable, but the C5 palsy rate halved.

Comparing two surgical approaches for treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of anterior versus posterior surgical approaches for multisegment cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM). METHODS: Eligible studies published between the period of January 2001 and April 2022 and comparing the anterior and posterior surgical approaches for treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy were retrieved from the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases. RESULTS: A total of 17 articles were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. This meta-analysis failed to show any significant difference in the duration of surgery, the hospitalization time, or the improvement in the Japanese Orthopedic Association score between the anterior and posterior approaches. The anterior approach, however, exhibited increased efficacy in the improvement of the neck disability index, reduction in the visual analog scale for cervical pain, and improvement in the cervical curvature compared with the posterior approach. CONCLUSION: Bleeding was also less with the anterior surgical approach. The posterior approach provided a significantly higher range of motion of the cervical spine and showed fewer postoperative complications compared with the anterior approach. While both the surgical approaches have good clinical outcomes and show postoperative neurological function improvement, the meta-analysis shows that both anterior and posterior approaches have certain merits and shortcomings. A meta-analysis of a larger number of randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up can conclusively determine which of the surgical approaches is more beneficial in the treatment of MCSM.

Up to 10-year surveillance comparison of survivability in single-level cervical disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in New York.

OBJECTIVE: Cervical disc replacement (CDR) is an alternative treatment to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), which is the current gold standard, for degenerative cervical diseases such as cervical spondylotic myelopathy and cervical radiculopathy. CDR has several theoretical benefits over ACDF, including preservation of motion, earlier return to unrestricted activity, and potentially a lower risk of adjacent-segment disease. Recent literature has reported positive clinical results for CDR, but few studies have investigated the long-term risk of revision surgery of CDR versus ACDF. The purpose of this study was to identify and analyze the epidemiological, clinical, and operative risk factors that affect revision rates following single-level CDR and ACDF procedures. METHODS: A retrospective cohort was extracted from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System using ICD-9 and CPT codes. Inclusion criteria were adult patients undergoing primary, subaxial (C3-7), single-level ACDF or CDR for cervical radiculopathy and/or cervical spondylotic myelopathy between 2005 and 2013. Survivability was defined as the time between the index procedure and the presence of a subsequent discharge record for cervical spinal fusion or disc replacement. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-square tests, t-tests, Cox proportional hazards models, and a Kaplan-Meier plot. RESULTS: A total of 7450 patients were included in this study (6615 ACDF and 835 CDR). When adjusted for patient demographics, the hazard ratios showed no significant differences in the incidence of revision risk between the two cohorts. The CDR cohort had a higher incidence of postoperative dysphagia (p < 0.05). Patients undergoing ACDF had a longer average hospital stay (2.8 vs 1.9 days, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in time to revision surgery (p = 0.486). CONCLUSIONS: CDR and ACDF have both been shown to be effective treatments for cervical spine disease. CDR patients had a shorter average inpatient hospital stay compared with ACDF patients but tended to experience dysphagia more frequently. There was a tendency toward increased survivability of CDR; however, this was not found to be statistically significant at any time point. The large size and heterogeneity of each cohort and the availability of > 10 years of surveillance data differentiate this study from other published literature. This investigation has limitations inherent to large data analysis studies, including the implementation and inaccuracy of diagnosis and procedural coding; however, this reflects real-world use of coding by practitioners.

Using Electrical Stimulation of the Ulnar Nerve Trunk to Predict Postoperative Improvement in Hand Clumsiness in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the immediate and short-term effects of preoperative electrical peripheral nerve stimulation (ePNS) on performance of the 10-second test could predict the early postoperative outcomes of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies have shown that early clinical improvement in CSM patients may be because of reversal of spinal cord ischemia after spinal cord compression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a 10-second test before surgery, after ePNS, and at discharge (one week after surgery) in 44 patients with CSM who underwent C3-C7 laminoplasty and evaluated their correlations. The effects of the procedures (ePNS or operation) and sides (stimulated or nonstimulated side) for the 10-second test were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to measure the relationship between the 10-second test values according to the method (after ePNS vs. surgery). In addition, the Bland-Altman method was used to evaluate the degree of agreement between the 10-second test obtained after ePNS versus shortly after surgery. RESULTS: The preoperative 10-second test showed the most improvement immediately after the administration of ePNS, with a gradual decrease for the first 30 minutes after completion. After the initial 30 minutes, performance decreased rapidly, and by 60 minutes performance essentially returned to baseline. The 10-second post-ePNS had a strong positive correlation with the 10-second test in the early postoperative period (at discharge=one week after surgery). These phenomena were observed with the left hand, the side stimulated with ePNS, as well as the right hand, the side not stimulated. CONCLUSIONS: Early postoperative outcomes after CSM surgery may be predicted by the results of preoperative ePNS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

A Five-Year Cost-Utility Analysis Comparing Synthetic Cage Versus Allograft Use in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cost-utility analysis. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a cost-analysis comparing synthetic cage (SC) versus allograft (Allo) over a five-year time horizon. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SC and Allo are two commonly used interbody choices for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery. Previous analyses comparative analyses have reached mixed conclusions regarding their cost-effectiveness, yet recent estimates provide high-quality evidence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision-analysis model comparing the use of Allo versus SC was developed for a hypothetical 60-year-old patient with cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing single-level ACDF surgery. A comprehensive literature review was performed to estimate probabilities, costs (2020 USD) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained over a five-year period. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis using a Monte Carlo simulation of 1000 patients was carried out to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and net monetary benefits. One-way deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed to estimate the contribution of individual parameters to uncertainty in the model. RESULTS: The use of Allo was favored in 81.6% of the iterations at a societal willing-to-pay threshold of 50,000 USD/QALY. Allo dominated (higher net QALYs and lower net costs) in 67.8% of the iterations. The incremental net monetary benefits in the Allo group was 2650 USD at a willing-to-pay threshold of 50,000 USD/QALY. One-way deterministic sensitivity analysis revealed that the cost of the index surgery was the only factor which significantly contributed to uncertainty. CONCLUSION: Cost-utility analysis suggests that Allo maybe a more cost-effective option compared with SCs in adult patients undergoing ACDF for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy with severe axial neck pain: is anterior or posterior approach better?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion (PCLF) is superior for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and high preoperative neck pain. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data using the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) CSM module. Patients who received a subaxial fusion of 3 or 4 segments and had a visual analog scale (VAS) neck pain score of 7 or greater at baseline were included. The 3-, 12-, and 24-month outcomes were compared for patients undergoing ACDF with those undergoing PCLF. RESULTS: Overall, 1141 patients with CSM were included in the database. Of these, 495 (43.4%) presented with severe neck pain (VAS score > 6). After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, we compared 65 patients (54.6%) undergoing 3- and 4-level ACDF and 54 patients (45.4%) undergoing 3- and 4-level PCLF. Patients undergoing ACDF had worse Neck Disability Index scores at baseline (52.5 ± 15.9 vs 45.9 ± 16.8, p = 0.03) but similar neck pain (p > 0.05). Otherwise, the groups were well matched for the remaining baseline patient-reported outcomes. The rates of 24-month follow-up for ACDF and PCLF were similar (86.2% and 83.3%, respectively). At the 24-month follow-up, both groups demonstrated mean improvements in all outcomes, including neck pain (p < 0.05). In multivariable analyses, there was no significant difference in the degree of neck pain change, rate of neck pain improvement, rate of pain-free achievement, and rate of reaching minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in neck pain between the two groups (adjusted p > 0.05). However, ACDF was associated with a higher 24-month modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale (mJOA) score (ß = 1.5 [95% CI 0.5-2.6], adjusted p = 0.01), higher EQ-5D score (ß = 0.1 [95% CI 0.01-0.2], adjusted p = 0.04), and higher likelihood for return to baseline activities (OR 1.2 [95% CI 1.1-1.4], adjusted p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Severe neck pain is prevalent among patients undergoing surgery for CSM, affecting more than 40% of patients. Both ACDF and PCLF achieved comparable postoperative neck pain improvement 3, 12, and 24 months following 3- or 4-segment surgery for patients with CSM and severe neck pain. However, multilevel ACDF was associated with superior functional status, quality of life, and return to baseline activities at 24 months in multivariable adjusted analyses.

Long-Term Follow-Up After Cervical Laminectomy without Fusion for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives were to study the effect of cervical laminectomy without fusion on the incidence of further cervical surgeries, the risk for cervical misalignment, and current functional status. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 340 patients who had undergone simple laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) at Helsinki University Hospital between 2000 and 2011. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (12.1%) had later undergone another cervical surgery during the follow-up of a mean of 8.5 years (maximum, 17.5 years). The most common indication for further surgery was residual stenosis at adjacent or other cervical levels (34%). Five patients (1%) required further surgery for correction of a sagittal balance problem. The mean Neck Disability Index was 28% at a median of 9.0 years after laminectomy. The mean EQ-5D (EuroQol 5 Dimension 3 Level) index score was 58.8 for patients and 77.2 for age-matched and gender-matched general population controls (P = 0.000), indicating patients' reduced health-related quality of life. Worse preoperative condition in the Nurick score was related to a lower (i.e., worse) EQ-5D score. In an additional arm of the study with radiographic imaging (40 patients), the mean change in sagittal alignment was 4.0° toward lordotic, and a newly developed kyphosis was found in 7.5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Because CSM is a serious degenerative progressive condition resulting in decreased health-related quality of life even after surgical treatment, the low rate of corrective surgery needed for alignment issues per se indicates that simple laminectomy can be a viable treatment option in treating multilevel CSM.

Residual anterior cord compression after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: evaluation of risk factors according to the most severely stenotic vertebral segment.

OBJECTIVE: Residual anterior spinal cord compression (RASCC) after cervical laminoplasty, which has been confirmed on postoperative MRI, is reportedly associated with poor clinical outcomes. To date, only a few studies have described the risk factors associated with RASCC. The aim of this study was to identify the factors that can predict the occurrence of RASCC after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), focusing on the location of the most stenotic segment. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center study, 120 patients who underwent C3-7 laminoplasty for multilevel CSM were included. Different techniques were used for C3 decompression, i.e., partial (dome-laminotomy) or complete (laminoplasty/laminectomy) decompression. RASCC was diagnosed using MRI conducted 3 weeks postoperatively. The patients were divided into two groups according to the segment with the most severe stenosis (Seg-MSS; C3-4 vs C4-7). Demographics, radiological data, and C3 decompression technique were compared between the two groups. Furthermore, intergroup comparisons were performed based on Seg-MSS. A logistic regression model was constructed to identify the factors predicting RASCC after patient stratification according to Seg-MSS. RESULTS: Forty patients (33.3%) had RASCC. The patients with Seg-MSS at C3-4 (51.3%) had a significantly higher incidence of RASCC (p = 0.003) than those with Seg-MSS at C4-7 (24.7%). Logistic regression analysis showed that in patients with Seg-MSS at C3-4, C3 partial decompression demonstrated a greater association with RASCC as opposed to complete decompression. Conversely, in patients with Seg-MSS at C4-7, kyphotic segmental lordotic angle was associated with an increased risk of RASCC. CONCLUSIONS: The risk factors for RASCC differed depending on the location of the most stenotic segment (C3-4 vs C4-7). If there is segmental kyphosis at the most stenotic segment at C4-7, anterior decompression and fusion should be considered. If C3-4 is the most stenotic segment, anterior surgery is also recommended, but alternatively, one can choose laminoplasty with complete C3 laminectomy and resection of the C2-3 ligamentum flavum.

Analysis of Functional Outcomes and Risk Factors for Facet Joint Distraction During Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to clarify functional outcomes of facet joint distraction (FJD) and identify specific risk factors for excessive FJD during single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 100 patients who underwent single-level ACDF for CSM from January 2016 to May 2020. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were obtained before surgery and 12 months after surgery. Radiographic parameters including anterior intervertebral height (AIH), posterior intervertebral height, facet joint gap, cage posterior depth (CPD), upper vertebral length, cervical segmental Cobb angle (CSCA), C2-C7 Cobb angle, and C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis were analyzed. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association Score, visual analog scale (VAS), and Neck Disability Index (NDI). RESULTS: Comparison between the appropriate FJD and excessive FJD groups showed statistically significant differences in the NDI, VAS, CPD, and ΔAIH (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that independent factors associated with excessive FJD were as follows: a ΔAIH > 2.28 mm (odds ratio [OR] = 6.792, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.885-24.470, P = 0.003), CPD > 12.45 mm (OR = 5.876, 95% CI = 1.828-18.895, P = 0.003), and post-CSCA < 0° (OR = 6.251, 95% CI = 1.275-30.633, P = 0.024). Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for the multilevel logistic regression model produced an area under the curve of 0.783 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with an FJD of >0.905 mm had worse NDI and VAS pain scores, but not a poorer modified Japanese Orthopedic Association Score recovery rate. Our findings suggested that a ΔAIH > 2.28 mm, CPD > 12.45 mm, and post-CSCA < 0° were independent risk factors for excessive FJD after single-level ACDF for CSM.

Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of glial and axonal injury in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

OBJECTIVE: Degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a major cause of spinal cord dysfunction with an unpredictable prognosis. Βiomarkers reflecting pathophysiological processes in CSM have been insufficiently investigated. It was hypothesized that preoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker levels are altered in patients with CSM and correlate with neurological status and outcome. METHODS: CSF biomarkers from patients with CSM and controls were analyzed with immunoassays. Spinal cord changes were evaluated with MRI. The American Spinal Cord Injury Association Impairment Scale, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ), and the EQ-5D questionnaire were applied prior to and 3 months after surgery. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Twenty consecutive CSM patients with a mean age of 67.7 ± 13 years and 63 controls with a mean age of 65.2 ± 14.5 years (p > 0.05) were included in the study. In the CSM subjects, CSF neurofilament light subunit (NF-L) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) concentrations were higher (p < 0.05), whereas fatty acid-binding protein 3 (FABP3), soluble amyloid precursor proteins (sAPPα and sAPPß), and amyloid ß (Aß) peptide (Aß38, Aß40, and Aß42) concentrations were lower than in controls (p < 0.05). Aß peptide levels correlated positively with symptom duration. Preoperative JOACMEQ lower extremity function and CSF NF-L levels correlated positively, and the JOACMEQ bladder function correlated negatively with sAPPα and sAPPß (p < 0.05). CSF NF-L and FABP3 levels were higher in patients with improved outcome (EQ-5D visual analog scale difference > 20). CONCLUSIONS: CSF biomarkers of glial and axonal damage, inflammation, and synaptic changes are altered in symptomatic CSM patients, indicating that axonal injury, astroglial activation, and Aß dysmetabolism may be present in these individuals. These findings reflect CSM pathophysiology and may aid in prognostication. However, future studies including larger patient cohorts, postoperative biomarker data and imaging, and longer follow-up times are required to validate the present findings.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Sagittal Alignment After Different Levels of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: From One-level to Three-level.

STUDY DESIGN: A nonrandomized and prospective study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and sagittal alignment after one-level, two-level, and three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ACDF is a widely used surgical approach for CSM. It remains controversial regarding to whether corrected lordosis can be maintained over time after different levels ACDF. METHODS: A total of 175 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent ACDF were enrolled in this retrospective study. The neurofunctional assessment was performed with the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and the recovery rate of JOA score. Radiographic parameters included C2-C7 lordosis, fused segments lordosis, T1 slope, the cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA). RESULTS: Patients with more fusion levels had more operative time and blood loss and higher rate of complications. All patients showed a larger cervical lordosis than that preoperatively and the restored lordosis increased with more segments involved. The restored lordosis had little change during the whole follow-up in one-level and two-level group. CL decreased from 25.65 ±â€Š9.31° on the third postoperative day to 20.25 ±â€Š10.03° at the final follow-up in three-level group (P = 0.001). Only T1 slope in three-level increased significantly from preoperative 26.55 ±â€Š9.36° to 29.06 ±â€Š7.54° on the third postoperative day (P = 0.011) and decreased to 26.89 ±â€Š7.22° (P = 0.043) at final follow-up. The JOA score all increased significantly at the last follow-up in each group, but the recovery rate of the JOA score in each group was similar (P = 0.096). CONCLUSION: ACDF with different levels had similar postoperative clinical outcomes. Three-level ACDF has an apparent advantage in restoring lordosis, a poor ability to maintain lordosis, and a higher incidence of complications compared to one-level or two-level ACDF.Level of Evidence: 3.

Modified Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy for The treatment of Degenerative Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Caused by Vertebral Posterior Osteophytosis.

BACKGROUND: The clinical application of posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (PPECD) achieves stable curative effects and satisfactory results in patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. However, the management of PPECD in the treatment of CSM is rarely discussed. CASE DESCRIPTION: A case of CSM in a 37-year-old woman with vertebral posterior marginal osteophytosis was managed by modified PPECD with anterior bony decompression. Here, we describe the first case report of CSM complicated by vertebral posterior marginal osteophytosis that was successfully treated by modified PPECD with anterior bony decompression and showed excellent response to treatment. The clinical symptoms were relieved after surgery, the pain and numbness of the left upper extremity improved significantly, the feeling of banding disappeared, and walking balance was restored. Postoperative scans and images of the cervical spine revealed successful anterior vertebral canal bone excision and decompression. CONCLUSIONS: This technique of modified PPECD with anterior bony decompression has the advantages of reduced trauma and shorter operative time, and it is very effective in the treatment of degenerative CSM caused by vertebral posterior osteophytosis. No surgery-related complications were noted.

Cervical Spine Balance of Multilevel Total Disc Replacement, Hybrid Surgery, and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With A Long-term Follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN: Comparative study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare cervical alignment among three-level total disc replacement (TDR), two prosthesis with one cage (2D1C), one prosthesis with two cages (1D2C), and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), then identify the importance of cervical balance of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There were few long-term comparisons on cervical alignment and cervical balance among three-level TDR, 2D1C, 1D2C, and ACDF for CSM. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with TDR, 15 with 2D1C, 36 with 1D2C, and 32 cases with ACDF were included with a mean follow-up of 90.9 ±â€Š8.9 months. C2-C7 cervical lordosis (CL), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 slope (T1S) were measured on x-ray at preoperation, immediate postoperation, and final follow-up, as well as range of motion (ROM), upper/lower adjacent ROM (UROM/LROM), and adjacent segment degeneration (ASD); cervical balance was assessed by T1S minus CL (T1SCL; 20°). Clinical outcomes included neck disability index (NDI) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score. RESULTS: NDI and JOA improved (P < 0.01)at postoperation and final-visit with no difference among four groups. ROM decreased mostly in ACDF group, although with a comparable inter-group UROM/LROM and ASD. All groups gained equal CL-improvement at final-visit. SVA and T1S together with their change were of no differences among groups (P > 0.05). There was a correlation among alignment parameters and between CL and ROM. The inter-group capacity of balance maintaining and imbalance correction was comparable (P > 0.05). The change of T1SCL was not correlated to NDI and JOA (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Adjacent segments were seldom affected. Cervical alignment was equivalently rebuilt among TDR, 2D1C, 1D2C, and ACDF. It was not essential to pay excessive attention to balance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Photogrammetric analysis: An objective measure to assess the craniocervical range of motion after cervical laminoplasty surgeries.

Surgical decompression using laminoplasty is commonly performed for multilevel stenosis with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. However, the long-term effects on the craniocervical range of motion (ROM) after surgery are not well understood. This study represents the first entry into the literature of photogrammetric analysis for clinical measurement of craniocervical ROM. All patients underwent a French-door laminoplasty from 1995 to 2016 and were evaluated radiologically and with postoperative photographs (photogrammetric analysis) to measure craniocervical ROM and axial rotation. Radiographic parameters were occiput to C2 angle, C1-2 angle, C2-7 angle/cervical lordosis (CL), T1-slope (T1S), and TS-CL were measured. Chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA) was utilized for flexion and extension, while nose-turn angle (NTA) was used to assess axial rotation. Forty-four patients (mean age: 65.7 years, 50% female) had a mean follow-up of 37.9 months. Mean values in neutral, flexion, and extension were occiput to C2 = 30°, 15°, and 43°; C1-C2 = -32°, -25°, -32°; and C2-C7 = -4°, 11°, -20°, respectively. Mean CL was within 1 SD of the established -17° (±13.86°). Mean T1S and TS-CL were 33° and 30° in the neutral position, respectively. Mean radiographic full range of motion from flexion to extension was 53°. NTA towards patients' left was 48° and the right side was 45°. Mean CBVA, was -4°, mean flexion 37°, and extension -45°; full range was 81°. Global craniocervical ROM has proven to be well preserved for many years following cervical laminoplasty. Photogrammetric analysis is a cost-effective and radiation-free method, accurate for quantitative assessment of craniocervical and cervical ROM.

Surgery of degenerative thoracic spinal stenosis-long-term outcome with quality-of-life after posterior decompression via an uni- or bilateral approach.

BACKGROUND: The rate of degenerative thoracic spinal stenosis (TSS) as underlying pathology for myelopathy is not precisely known, and larger case series are only available for the Asian region. We present one of the largest European series to evaluate rate and clinical outcome after dorsal decompression via a uni- or bilateral approach. METHOD: We investigated patients' characteristics, imaging/surgical parameters, and outcomes with quality-of-life (QOL) in all patients who underwent surgical treatment for TSS between 2013 and 2018 in a university neurosurgical clinic. RESULTS: From 645 patients with surgery for degenerative spondylotic myelopathy within 6 years, 28 patients (4.3%) suffered from TSS. Median age was 70.4 years with a slight predominance of the female sex (m:f = 1:1.3). The most frequent symptoms (mean duration 7.6 months) were ataxia (61%) and sensory changes (50%). The stenoses (median Naganawa score 3) mostly resulted from a combined osseous/ligamentous hypertrophy and disc prolapse, the majority located below Th8 (75%). Nineteen patients with lateralized compression underwent bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach (fenestration/hemilaminectomy with "undercutting" procedure), and 9 patients with circular pathology underwent bilateral-approached decompression (laminectomy). There were no significant differences of patients' characteristics, blood loss, operation time, and in-patient stay between both surgical groups. Independent from the mode of surgery, the spinal canal was significantly (p < 0.001) widened (median Naganawa score 0), and pain (p = 0.04), myelopathy (mJOA score p = 0.01), and QOL (Oswestry Disability Index, p = 0.03; SF-36-MCS, p = 0.01) were significantly improved at long-term follow-up (mean 35.1 months). CONCLUSIONS: Non-tumorous myelopathy is caused in about 4% of patients by TSS and can be effectively treated by surgical decompression via both a uni- or bilateral approach.

Lower lumbar vertebra size and anatomic variation: An Anatomo-Radiologic Study.

INTRODUCTION: In routine practice, it is often necessary to use shorter screws in L5 than L4. The present study measured L5 versus L4 vertebral pedicles, to guide surgical strategy. MATERIAL AND METHOD: CT or MRI scans for 95 patients were analyzed. Radiographic measurements (anteroposterior diameter (APD), pedicle length (PL) and pedicle width (PW)) were taken by a spine surgeon. Statistical analysis used R 3.4.3 software. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were included: 48 female (50.53%), 47 male (49.47%); mean age, 57 years (range, 19-85 years). Univariate analysis found a strong correlation between right and left PL values in L4 and L5. Right and left values were pooled, obtaining a mean L4 PL of 55.34mm (range, 54.23-56.45mm) and L5 PL of 51.80mm (44.81-58.80) and L4 PW of 10.48mm (10.06-10.91) and L5 PW of 9.90mm (7.43-12.39). Multivariate analysis disclosed significant effects of age and gender, with greater age and male gender associated with greater anteroposterior vertebral diameter. Mean anteroposterior vertebral length was significantly shorter in L5 than L4 by 3.57mm (range, 4.08-3.06mm). DISCUSSION: Anteroposterior pedicle length was shorter in L5 than L4, in line with the literature. This answers the surgeon's question: "Should pedicle screws be shorter in L5 than L4?". From these results, it seems logical to use an L5 screw that is 5mm shorter than in L4, to secure good intra-body screw fixation.